Saturday, February 24, 2007

12 Powerful Customer Service Questions - An Organizational View

Most companies see the ultimate value in offering superior customer service, yet many fail to recognize the numerous organizational factors that impact their ability to provide exceptional service. To attain a truly customer-focused organization, a continual assessment of the culture and every process within the organization must be maintained. Following are a list of questions to answer regarding your organization's ability to "wow" the customers.
1. A Customer-Focused Environment

1. Is the topic of customer service frequently discussed within the organization?

Are customer satisfaction, dissatisfaction, and ideas for improving customer service, topics for employee meetings, recognition programs, company newsletters, and discussed "openly" as a way of daily organizational life?

2. Does the environment within your organization convey customer-focused leadership?

Are employees told one thing, but see their leaders not "walking the talk?" Are the organizational policies customer-focused to satisfy customers, or do they tend to drive customers to competitors?

3. Are there customer service "standards" in place to clarify the desired level of performance?

There are often sales objectives and other quantifiable internal goals, but are there customer service standards to address what the customer sees, hears and experiences when doing business with your organization? How long should a customer have to wait to get a return telephone call, or to get the correct answer to a question? How should customers be greeted? What kind of "options" and alternatives should be offered to customers?

4. How are customer complaints resolved?

What kind of "service recovery" (compensating the customer) currently exists when your organization makes a mistake, or the customer thinks you made a mistake? Are employees empowered to fix customer problems? Empowering employees not only builds their self-esteem, but also can expedite
and alleviate a potentially poor customer experience. How cumbersome is the process for employees to satisfy disgruntled customers?


5. Does a recognition program exist that is based on satisfying the customer?

Many successful organizations, including Disney, have a culture where employees recognize other employees for not only satisfying "external" customers, but for satisfying "internal" customers. "Catch each other doing something right," and reward it. A reward may not necessarily be monetary, but some form of recognition, praise, or a simple "thank you." A great book on recognition is "1001 Ways to Reward Employees" by Bob Nelson, which has many cost effective and free ways to recognize and reward employees.
2. Feedback, Feedback, and More Feedback

6. Does your organization have an ongoing method for "listening" to front-line employees?
Does the organization value input from employees? Are there open discussions with employees to gather "their" suggestions, customer comments, and ideas for improvement? If not, you may be missing your closest contact with customers.

7. What method does your organization use to get "feedback" from customers?

Is feedback gathered in-person from customers, over the telephone, or on a written feedback form? Do you have a process to measure customers' satisfaction with a particular "transaction," as well as their over-all level of satisfaction with the organization? Do you actually know what customers "value," versus what you think they value? Finally, is the customer feedback regularly shared with employees or kept hidden in the corporate office?

8. Do supervisors spend the necessary time giving feedback regarding performance?

Feedback is needed not just once a year or quarterly, but continuously on a daily basis. Is there significant positive feedback, or do you tend to miss the "99 things done right" and catch the "one thing done wrong?" If supervisors are trained in customer service and in coaching skills they can more successfully guide and develop employees' self-esteem, performance and satisfaction level.


3. Do They Know How to Do It?

9. What kinds of training have your front-line employees, supervisory and leadership teams received?

Is an incorrect assumption made that everyone comes to their job with "top-notch" customer service, supervisory, and leadership skills? In all cases, there is always room for improvement in taking the organization to an even higher level of performance.

10. Do front-line employees know how to create a customer-focused experience?

Do they understand the importance of making every customer contact a memorable, positive, and professional encounter? Do they understand how communication (verbal and nonverbal) impacts how customers perceive the organization's receptiveness to their needs? Do those who answer customer calls know the proper telephone techniques to satisfy customers? Do all employees know the value of taking ownership for customer complaints?

11. Does your leadership send a clear message of where we've been, where we're going, as well as gather employee input on how best to get there?

Is there ongoing communication with all employees during a process of organizational change, or are new organizational structures, processes and goals simply directives from management?

12. Do supervisors understand their role in developing employees?

Do your supervisors, new or experienced, understand relationships and how they influence (positively or negatively) employee performance? Is coaching a major focus of their job, or is sporadic feedback more common? Do supervisors set clear expectations (standards, policies, overall direction), provide constant feedback, and recognize accomplishment?

Saturday, February 10, 2007

Why English Is So Difficult

We'll begin with a box, and the plural is boxes; but the plural of ox became oxen not oxes. One fowl is a goose, but two are called geese, yet the plural of moose should never be meese.
You may find a lone mouse or a nest full of mice; yet the plural of house is houses, not hice. If the plural of man is always called men, why shouldn't the plural of pan be called pen?
If I spoke of my foot and show you my feet, and I give you a boot, would a pair be called beet?
If one is a tooth and a whole set are teeth, why shouldn't the plural of booth be called beeth?
Then one may be that, and three would be those, yet hat in the plural would never be hose, and the plural of cat is cats, not cose.
We speak of a brother and also of brethren, but though we say mother we never say methren. Then the masculine pronouns are he, his and him, but imagine the feminine, she, shis and shim.
Some reasons to be grateful if you grew up speaking English;
1) The bandage was wound around the wound.
2) The farm was used to produce produce.
3) The dump was so full that it had to refuse more refuse.
4) We must polish the Polish furniture.
5) He could lead if he would get the lead out.
6) The soldier decided to desert his dessert in the desert.
7) There is no time like the present, he said it was time to present the present.
8) At the Army base, a bass was painted on the head of a bass drum.
9) When shot at, the dove dove into the bushes.
10) I did not object to the object.
11) The insurance was invalid for the invalid.
12) There was a row among the oarsmen about how to row.
13) They were too close to the door to close it.
14) The buck does funny things when the does are present.
15) A seamstress and a sewer fell down into a sewer line.
16) To help with planting, the farmer taught his sow to sow.
17) The wind was too strong to wind the sail.
18) After a number of Novocain injections, my jaw got number.
19) Upon seeing the tear in the painting I shed a tear.
20) I had to subject the subject to a series of tests.
21) How can I intimate this to my most intimate friend?
22) I spent last evening evening out a pile of dirt.
Let's face it - English is a crazy language.
There is no egg in eggplant nor ham in hamburger; neither apple nor pine In pineapple.
English muffins weren't invented in England .
We take English for granted. But if we explore its paradoxes, we find that quicksand can work slowly, boxing rings are square and a guinea pig is neither from Guinea nor is it a pig.
And why is it that writers write but fingers don't fing, grocers don't groce and hammers don't ham?
Doesn't it seem crazy that you can make amends but not one amend?
If you have a bunch of odds and ends and get rid of all but one of them, what do you call it?
If teachers taught, why didn't preachers praught?
If a vegetarian eats vegetables, what does a humanitarian eat? In what language do people recite at a play and play at a recital?
Ship by truck and send cargo by ship?
Have noses that run and feet that smell?
How can a slim chance and a fat chance be the same, while a wise man and a wiseguy are opposites?
You have to marvel at the unique lunacy of a language in which your house can burn up as it burns down, in which you fill in a form by filling it out and in which an alarm goes off by going on.
If Dad is Pop, how come! Mom isn't Mop?
GO FIGURE! That's American English.
unlike Sanskrit english made its own rules of pronounciation & Grammar in a different way based on the words derivated from
example CH is pronounced as ka wen the word is derived from greek example
character = karakter
CH is pronounced as sha wen the word is from frenchex champagne,chateau
similarly with singulars & plurals.